Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-04-10

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 13593 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 13593 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 13593 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 13593 of 2026 Pritam Singh And Another .....Applicant(s) Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sanjay Kumar Yadav, Sury Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for applicants and learned AGA for the State- respondent. 2. The present application has been preferred challenging the charge-sheet dated 03.08.2022, cognizance/summoning order dated 04.01.2023 along with entire proceedings of Case No.257 of 2023 (State Vs. Pritam Singh and others), arising out of Case Crime No.419 of 2022, under Sections 406, 342 IPC, P.S. Subhash Nagar, District- Bareilly, pending before learned Judge of Small Cause Cases, Bareilly. 3. Learned counsel for applicant argued that applicants have been falsely implicated in the present case by opposite party no.2 only to harass them since no offence as alleged, has ever been committed by them. It has also been argued by learned counsel for applicants that there is due of Rs.3,50,000/- upon the elder son of the informant of applicant and only to usurp the said money, up

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 13593 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam