Allahabad High Court · 2026-04-21
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 11400 of 2026 at Allahabad
- Citation / case number
- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 11400 of 2026 at Allahabad
- Court
- Allahabad High Court
- Petitioner
- APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 11400 of 2026 at Allahabad
- Respondent
- Unknown
Judgment text excerpt
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 11400 of 2026 Priyanshu Divyal .....Applicant(s) Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Aditya Vikram, Jagriti Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. The instant application under section 528 BNSS has been preferred to quash the charge-sheet dated 09.02.2024 and cognizance/summoning order dated 20.03.2025 as well as the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.27798 of 2024 (State vs. Aman Rai & Others) arising out of Case Crime No.198 of 2024, under sections 303(2), 317(2), 317(4), 317(5), 318(2) BNS, P.S. Doharighat, District- Mau, pending in the court of learned Civil Judge (Junior Division) FTC/ACJM, Mau. 3. Learned counsel for applicant argued that applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case by opposite party no.2 only to harass him since no offence as alleged, has ever been committed by him. It has also been argued by learned counsel for applicant that the FIR has been lodged against one unknown and the applicant is nowhere