Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-04-07

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 1043 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 1043 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 1043 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 1043 of 2026 Safeek And 4 Others .....Applicant(s) Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Arvind Kumar, Rajesh Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Court No. - 79 HON'BLE AVNISH SAXENA, J. 1. Sri Shanti Kumar Yadav, learned counsel has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of opposite party no. 2. The same is taken on record. 2. Heard Sri Rajesh Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for accused applicants and learned AGA for State. 3. The instant application has been filed under Section 528 BNSS by applicants to quash the entire proceeding of Case No. 1629 of 2020, arising out of Case Crime No. 103 of 2020, under Sections 147, 323, 504, 506 of I.P.C., P.S. Baharia, District Prayagraj, pending in the court of Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 15, Prayagraj inter alia on the ground of compromise. 4. It is jointly contended by learned counsel for the parties that accused applicants and opposite party no. 2 are close relatives. There was some dispute between the parties which led to lodging of the FIR. The parties have entered into compromise which has been filed at P

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 1043 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam