Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Allahabad High Court · 2026-04-13

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 10356 of 2026 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 10356 of 2026 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 10356 of 2026 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 10356 of 2026 Aman Pandey .....Applicant(s) Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sudarshan Singh, Vivek Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Brijesh Kumar, G.A. Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SAURABH SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard Sri Vivek Singh, learned counsel for applicant and Sri Brijesh Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of opposite party no.2 as well as learned AGA for the State. 2. Present application has been preferred with the prayer to quash cognizance/summoning order dated 21.08.2024 as well as entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.10801 of 2024 (State Vs. Shashikant Pandey @ Sonu and others), arising out of Case Crime no. 230 of 2024, under Sections 420, 406 IPC, P.S.- Ahraula, District Azamgarh, pending in the court of learned Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate, Court No.13, Azamgarh. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of applicant has challenged the impugned chargesheet along with cognizance/summoning order and entire proceedings of the present case precisely on the ground that Sections 420 and 406 IPC cannot go together in the same breath as per the pr

APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. 10356 of 2026 at Allahabad · Niyam