ANJU CHADHA AND ANR vs BHAVESH MADAN AND ANR

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on: 15th January, 2026 Pronounced on: 07th April, 2026 + RFA 70/2024, CM APPL. 5115/2024 1. MS. ANJU CHADHA W/O Mr. Virender Chadha R/O 136, Mandakini Enclave, Alaknanda, New Delhi. 2. MR. VIRENDER CHADHA R/O 136, Mandakini Enclave, Alaknanda, New Delhi. .....Appellants Through: Mr. Rishi Bharadwaj, Advocate. versus 1. BHAVESH MADAN S/O Late Sh. R.C. Madan R/O 137, Mandakini Enclave, Alaknanda, New Delhi 2. SMT. REETU MADAN W/O Sh. Bhavesh Madan, R/O 137, Mandakini Enclave, Alaknanda, New Delhi. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rajesh Mahindru & Mr. Birender Chaudhary, Advs. for R-1. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA J U D G M E N T NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J. 1. An Appeal under Section 96 CPC has been filed on behalf of the South-East District, Saket Appellants Ms. Anju Chadha and Mr. Virender Chadha against Judgment dated 18.12.2023, whereby learned ADJ-01, New Delhi, has decreed the Suit for Mandatory Injunction, Permanent Injunction RFA 70/2024 Page 1 of 15 Signature Not Verified DigitallySigned By:RITA SHARMA Signing Date:08.04.2026 16:47:32 and Damages and directed the Appellants to vacate the Suit Property within 30 days, under Order XII Rule 6 CPC. 2. CS DJ 619/2020 was filed by Respondent Nos.1 and 2 / Bhavesh Madan and Reetu Madan for Mandatory Injunction, Permanent Injunction and Damages against Anju Chadha/Respondent No.3 and her husband Virender Chadha Respondent No.4. 3. The facts as narrated in the Plaint, were that Plaintiffs Bhavesh Madan and Reetu Madan were registered owners and in legal possession of the Suit Property bearing No.136, Mandakini Enclave, Alaknanda, New Delhi, (hereinafter referred to as suit property), by virtue of Sale Deed dated 20.11.2009. 4. It was claimed that in the mon