ANITA vs STATE OF NCT DELHI & ORS.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 09.04.2026 W.P.(CRL) 1138/2026 ANITA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shailendra Mani Tripathi, Ms. Pooja Shilpkar, Mr. P. Raghab Mishra, Ms. Manisha Yadav, Mr. Praveen Kumar Mishra and Mr. Vishal Kumar, Advocates versus STATE OF NCT DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Yasir Rauf Ansari, ASC for the State and Mr. Alok Sharma, Advocate with SI Sandeep CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. For convenience, the prayer clause of the petition is extracted below: “In view of the aforesaid facts and circumstances, the petitioner herein most humbly prays that this hon'ble court may be pleased to: A. Direct the respondent no 2 to take appropriate action on representation/ complaint of the petitioner dated 13.02.2026 which is annexed with this petition as annexure P-1, in the compliance of the direction of Hon’ble supreme court regarding Lalita Kumari versus State of UP [2013] 14 S.C.R. 713 read with section 173 of BNSS 2023. W.P. (CRL.) 1138/2026 pages 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45569 af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH 2. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that his prayer