ANIL vs ANITA GUPTA & ORS.

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on: 22nd January, 2026 Pronounced on: 25thApril, 2026 + CM APPL. 9549/2026 to file RSA 72/2025 & CM APPL. 24785/2025 in RSA 64/2024: ANIL S/O Late Sh. Ram Niwas R/O WZ-41, Khasra No.130, Kumhar Wali Gali, Shakurpur, Delhi. .....Appellant Through: Mr. Umang Mittal, Advocate. versus 1. ANITA GUPTA W/O Sh. Rakesh Gupta R/O H.No.M-333, Shakurpur, Delhi. 2. NIRMALA DEVI W/O Not Known R/O WZ-70, Khasra No.130, Kumhar Wali Gali, Shakurpur, Delhi. 3. ANITA RANI W/O Late Sanjay Kumar R/O WZ-70, Khasra No.130, Kumhar Wali Gali, Shakurpur, Delhi. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Meenakshi Gupta, Advocate. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA J U D G M E N T NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J. 1. An Application under Order I Rule 10 read with Section 146 and Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908 (hereinafter referred to as ‘CPC’), has been filed on behalf of the Applicant / Sh. Anil son of Late Sh. RSA 64/2024 & RSA 72/2025 Page 1 of 9 Signature Not Verified Signed By:VIKAS ARORA Signing Date:02.05.2026 16:23:44 Ram Niwas, to be impleaded as party in the array of parties as a Respondent in Appeal No. RSA 64/2024, filed by Nirmala Devi and Anita Rani against Anita Gupta, being a necessary party to the present proceedings. 2. Likewise, Leave to Appeal has been filed vide Application dated 17.04.2025, to seek leave to challenge the judgement through RSA 72/2025, inter se the Respondents, in which the Appellant was not made a party to. Both are decided together, as they involve same challenge. 3. The factual matrix involved in both the Applications, is that the Applicant / Sh. Anil has claimed that he had purchased the Suit Property for valid sale consideration of Rs.3,00,000/- from Appellant No.2 / Smt. Anita Rani, wife of Sh