AMITKUMAR @AMIT KUMAR SINGH & ORS. vs THE STATE (GOVT.OF.NCTOF DELHI) & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~76 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 27th April, 2026 + CRL.M.C. 3193/2026 & CRL.M.A. 12938/2026 AMITKUMAR @AMIT KUMAR SINGH & ORS. .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Deepak Verma, Advocate along with petitioners-in-person versus THE STATE (GOVT.OF.NCTOF DELHI) & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Raj Kumar, APP for State/R-1 with SI Subah Singh, PS Karawal Nagar Ms. Renu Tyagi, Advocate for R-2 with R-2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. Petitioners herein seek quashing of FIR No. 82/2018 dated 21.02.2018 registered at Police Station Karawal Nagar, for commission of offences under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC, along with all consequential proceedings arising therefrom, on the basis of compromise arrived at between the parties. 2. Marriage between petitioner No. 1 and respondent No. 2 was solemnized on 30.01.2015 according to Hindu rites and ceremonies at Delhi. The couple was blessed with a girl, namely, Shagun. 3. However, on account of some matrimonial discord and temperamental differences, respondent No. 2 reported the matter to the police which resulted in registration of aforesaid FIR. 4. Charge-sheet has already been filed and charges have also been Signature Not Verified Signed By:SONIA CRL.M.C. 3193/2026 1 THAPLIYAL Signing Date:29.04.2026 11:30:33 ascertained. 5. Fact, however, remains that when petition under Section 125 Cr.P.C. seeking maintenance was filed by respondent No. 2 herein was referred to Counselling Cell, Family Court, North-East, Karkardooma, Delhi, the parties were able to settle all their matrimonial disputes. Such settlement took place before Principal Counselor attached with Family Court, North-East, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi. 6. Respondent No. 2 is present in person with her counsel.