Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

april 2026

Delhi High Court · 2026-04-13

ADOBE INCORPORATED & ORS. vs YY AND ORS

Citation / case number
FAO (COMM)-103/2026 2026:DHC:3079-DB
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
ADOBE INCORPORATED & ORS.
Respondent
YY AND ORS
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 13.04.2026 + FAO (COMM) 103/2026 ADOBE INCORPORATED & ORS. .....Appellants Through: Ms. Aarshia Behl, Ms. Shruti Baid, Ms. Aashi Sharma, Ms. Bhavya Manda, Mr. Suryansh Gupta, Ms. Yashi Singh and Ms. Ashwarya Bansal, Advs. versus YY AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA V. KAMESWAR RAO, J. (ORAL) CM APPL. 23713/2026 & CM APPL. 23714/2026 (Exemptions) 1. Exemption is allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. The application stands disposed of. CM APPL. 23823/2026 (For leave to file addl. docs.) 3. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed. 4. The application stands disposed of. FAO (COMM) 103/2026 & CM APPL. 23710/2026, CM APPL. 23712/2026 5. This appeal lays a challenge to an order dated 20.02.2026 passed by the learned District Judge, (Commercial Court-07) South-East District, Saket Court, New Delhi, whereby, the learned District Judge has rejected the 6. The submission of Ms. Behl, the learned counsel for the appellants is primarily that the learned District Judge has erred in rejecting the applications under

ADOBE INCORPORATED & ORS. vs YY AND ORS · Niyam