Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-09-10

WRIT - A No. 9216 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 9216 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 9216 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 9216 of 2025 Rinki Devi .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of Up And 8 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Manta Ram Gupta, Shivam Gupta, Shubham Gupta Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Prabhat Pandey, Sher Bahadur Singh Court No. - 4 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Standing Counsel. Compliance affidavit has been filed today which is taken on record in which vide para 17 it has been stated that petitioner has been given joining as Anganbadi Worker. In view of the above, she will be paid salary until ordered otherwise by this Court in this petition. However, learned counsel for the petitioner states that in view of para 12 of the Government Order dated 21.03.2023, if the selected and appointed Anganbadi Workers lefts the place of her marriage where she was appointed, then of course and appropriate action can be taken after getting report and approval by the District Magistrate. Sri Prabhat Pandey, learned Advocate has put in appearance by filing counter affidavit on behalf of respondent no. 9. He submits that on the date of appointment, petitioner was married. Sin

WRIT - A No. 9216 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam