Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-09-09

WRIT - A No. 4633 of 2024 at Lucknow

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 4633 of 2024 at Lucknow
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 4633 of 2024 at Lucknow
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 4633 of 2024 U.P. Jal Nigam (Rural) Thru. Managing Director Lko. And Another .....Petitioner(s) Versus Om Prakash Pandey .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Samir Om Counsel for Respondent(s) : Savita Jain Court No. - 1 HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J. HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J. 1. Heard Ms. Pooja Singh, Advocate holding brief of Shri Prashant Singh Atal, learned counsel for petitioners- Jal Nigam, Lucknow and Ms. Savita Jain, learned counsel for the private respondent. 2. By means of this petition, the petitioners- Jal Nigam, Lucknow have challenged the judgment and order dated 01.05.2023 passed by U.P. Public Services Tribunal in Claim Petition No.86 of 2018; Om Prakash Pandey vs. State of U.P. and ors., by which the claim petition of the private respondent, who was working as Assistant Engineer, has been allowed and the punishment order dated 11.07.2017 as also the appellate order dated 26.07.2017 have been quashed. 3. The submission of learned counsel for Jal Nigam, Lucknow is that three charges were levelled against the private opposite party and charge no.2 was found proved, but the Tribunal has proceeded on the pre

WRIT - A No. 4633 of 2024 at Lucknow · Niyam