WRIT - A No. 14039 of 2025 at Allahabad

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 14039 of 2025 Yudhveer Singh .....Petitioner(s) Versus State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Qaisar Kamal Ansari Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 4 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the records. 2. It is argued by learned counsel for the petitioner that without giving any notice and opportunity of hearing petitioner has been saddled with the liability of recovery to the tune of Rs.4,69,266/- and Rs.50,000/- has already stood deducted. It is thus claimed that the order impugned is in gross violation of principles of natural justice. 3. Learned Standing Counsel though sought to defend the order but could not demonstrate as to under which circumstances recovery has been directed and the order also does not reflect as to whether the petitioner was served with a notice prior to passing the same. 4. In view of the above, I consider it appropriate for the District Police Commissionerate, Gautam Budh Nagar to reconsider the matter of the petitioner by offering notice to him and seeking reply. 5. The appropriate steps to serve notice upon the petiti