Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-09-16

WRIT - A No. 13290 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 13290 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 13290 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 13290 of 2025 Suman Kumar .....Petitioner(s) Versus Union Of India And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kiran Rani, Laloo Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : Archit Mehrotra, A.S.G.I. Court No. - 4 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Laloo Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Sakshi Mehrotra, learned Advocate holding brief of Sri Archit Mehrotra, learned counsel for the respondents. 2. At the very outset, Ms. Sakshi Mehrotra, learned Advocate submits that petitioner had not been afforded any opportunity to contest CFSL report before passing of the order impugned by the competent authority and hence matter stands covered by the judgment of this Court in the case of Ran Vijay Singh and others v. Union of India and others in Writ - A No.- 2813 of 2017 and connected matters, decided on 16th April, 2018, in which vide paragraph 25, 26, 27, 28, 29 and 30 the Court has held thus: "26. The respondents were expected to confront the petitioners with material relied upon against them. A show cause containing such materials was required to have been issued, particularly when petitioners were being debarred f

WRIT - A No. 13290 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam