Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-09-03

WRIT - A No. 13039 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 13039 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 13039 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 13039 of 2025 Rajesh Kumar Srivastava .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajnish Kumar Srivastava, Siddharth Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 4 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. 1. Heard Sri Rajnish Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State. 2. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India, petitioner has prayed for quashing of the enquiry proceedings initiated vide chargesheet dated 19.12.2018 basically on the ground that initially when the petitioner was suspended in the year 2013, nothing further progressed in the matter and he had been reinstated in 2017 but the salary for the said period he remained under suspension was not paid. However, subsequently in the year 2018, the disciplinary proceeding was initiated with the issuance of the chargesheet to which petitioner submitted detailed reply and upon reply being submitted, an enquiry report was also furnished by the enquiry officer against the petitioner which became subject matter of consideration b

WRIT - A No. 13039 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam