Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-09-03

WRIT - A No. 13020 of 2025 at Allahabad

Citation / case number
WRIT - A No. 13020 of 2025 at Allahabad
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
WRIT - A No. 13020 of 2025 at Allahabad
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 13020 of 2025 Pooja Singh .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ashok Kumar Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Siddharth Singhal Court No. - 4 HON'BLE AJIT KUMAR, J. Heard Sri Ashok Kumar Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Akhilesh Kumar Maurya, learned Advocate holding brief of Sri Siddharth Singhal, learned counsel for respondent no. 3 as well as learned Standing Counsel. By means of this petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution, petitioner has prayed for a writ in the nature of mandamus to command the respondent Commission to consider the appointment of the petitioner on the post of Mukhya Sewika treating her in the category of Economic Weaker Section (EWS) and so accordingly give her vertical reservation under the relevant rules and as per the advertisement. It is contended on behalf of the petitioner that the petitioner has furnished detailed income certificate on 27.09.2021 issued by the competent authority and yet petitioner has not been considered in the said category. It is further contended that petitioner has obtained income

WRIT - A No. 13020 of 2025 at Allahabad · Niyam