VIPUL AGGARWAL & ORS. vs STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~19 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 02.09.2025 + CRL.M.C. 1142/2025 VIPUL AGGARWAL & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Ms. Vani Sharma, Advocates. versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Manjeet Arya, APP for State with IO/SI Joginder. Mr. Sanjay Dahiya and Mr. Sanjay Sharma, Advocates for R-2. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. Petitioners seek quashing of case FIR No. 1070/2023 of PS Wazirabad for offence under Section 498A/406/34 IPC on the ground that the complainant de facto (respondent no.2) has compromised the disputes with the petitioners. 2. Respondent no.2 present (through videoconferencing) with her counsel in court and is identified by the IO/SI Joginder. 3. As reflected from previous record, detailed statements of parties have CRL.M.C.1142/2025 Page 1 of 2 pages Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15570996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e2 6fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2025.09.02 17:04:29 -07'00' Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:NEETU N NAIR Signing Date:02.09.2025 18:32:03 already been recorded by the concerned Joint Registrar. State has no objection to this petition. 4. I have spoken with respondent no.2 in Hindi and it is stated by her that she has compromised all disputes with the petitioners. It is further stated by her that towards full and final settlement of all her claims including stridhan and alimony, she has received a sum of Rs.23,50,000/- from petitioners. Marriage between petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 already stands disso