VIKRAM vs STATE GOVT. OF DELHI

Judgment text excerpt

$~4 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 24.09.2025 + BAIL APPLN. 2789/2025 VIKRAM .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Pratyush Prasanna and Ms. Malvika Kulkarni, Advocates. versus STATE GOVT. OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Manoj Pant, APP for the State CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA JUDGMENT DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J. (Oral) 1. By way of the present application, the applicant seeks grant of regular bail in case arising out of FIR bearing no. 388/2013, registered at Police Station Jaitpur, Delhi for the commission of offence punishable under Sections 302/307/324/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (hereafter ‘IPC’). 2. Brief facts of the present case are that on 05.10.2013, a PCR call had been received at the P.S. Jaitpur, Delhi informing that a person had been shot at, and the person who had fired the gunshot had been caught. Thereafter, the police officials had reached the place of the incident, however, it was then informed that the injured Signature Not Verified BAIL APPLN. 2789/2025 Page 1 of 9 Digitally Signed By:ZEENAT PRAVEEN Signing Date:27.09.2025 18:16:53 persons had been taken to the hospital by PCR vehicles. On initial inspection, two live rounds and one empty cartridge, a cloth bag, an artificial pistol, a bomb shaped banded cloth article, a liquid in a water bottle, and a knife lying at the spot of incident and blood stains were found. It was further informed to the police officials by the Apollo Hospital that one person, Om Prakash, had been declared as “brought dead”. Thereafter, the statement of Madan Mohan i.e., son of the deceased had been recorded, wherein he had revealed that his sister, Suman was married to the present applicant for about four years; however, due to frequent quarrels, they both had separat