Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-09-18

UNION OF INDIA AND ANR vs NEETA MISHRA

Citation / case number
W.P.(C)-2937/2023 2025:DHC:8454-DB
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
UNION OF INDIA AND ANR
Respondent
NEETA MISHRA
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 18.09.2025 W.P.(C) 2937/2023 & CM APPL. 11442/2023 UNION OF INDIA AND ANR .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Mukul Singh, CGSC, Ms. Ira Singh, Mr. Aryan Dhaka, Advs. versus NEETA MISHRA .....Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MADHU JAIN NAVIN CHAWLA, J. (ORAL) 1. In spite of service, none has been appearing for the respondent. The respondent is, therefore, proceeded ex-parte. 2. This petition has been filed by the petitioners, challenging the Order dated 13.09.2022 passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Tribunal’) in O.A. No. 730/2017, titled Neeta Mishra v. Union of India and Anr., whereby the learned Tribunal disposed of the O.A. filed by the respondent herein with a direction to the petitioners to supply copies of the ACRs for the period 1987-1988 to 1992-1993 to the respondent. It was further directed that upon receipt of the copies of the ACRs, the respondent shall be at liberty to make a 3. The respondent had filed the above O.A. stating therein that she had joined the petitioners as JIO-I/G on 20.0