Delhi High Court · 2025-09-04
TATA CAPITAL LIMITED vs KRISHNA KUMAR
- Citation / case number
- ARB.P.-983/2025 2025:DHC:7873
- Court
- Delhi High Court
- Petitioner
- TATA CAPITAL LIMITED
- Respondent
- KRISHNA KUMAR
Judgment text excerpt
$~O-1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + ARB.P. 983/2025 Date of Decision: 04.09.2025 IN THE MATTER OF: TATA CAPITAL LIMITED REGISTERED OFFICE AT 11TH FLOOR, TOWER A, PENINSULAR BUSINESS PARK, GANPAT RAO KADAM MARG, LOWER PAREL, MUMBAI – 400013, MAHARASHTRA BRANCH OFFICE AT 9TH FLOOR, VIDEOCON TOWER BLOCK-E1, JHANDEWALAN EXTN. NEW DELHI-110055 THROUGH ITS AUTHORIZED REPRESENTATIVE SATENDRA YADAV .....PETITIONER Through: Mr. Varun Bedi and Ms. Swati Ahalawat, Advs. versus KRISHNA KUMAR FLAT NO S-2, 2ND FLOOR RAM GYAN VILLA PLOT NO 705 B-BIOCK KANPUR UTTAR PRADESH – 208020 .....Respondent Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV JUDGEMENT PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J. (ORAL) Signature Not Verified Signature Not Verified Signed By:AMIT KUMAR Signed SHARMA Signing Date:09.09.2025 By:PURUSHAINDRA 17:52:43 ARB.P. 983/2025 Page 1KAURAV KUMAR of 10 1. The present petition has been filed under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (the Act), seeking appointment of an Arbitrator, to adjudicate upon the disputes that have arisen between the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner has placed on record the affidavit of service of notice on the respondent which is extracted as under: “AFFIDAVIT I, Satendra Yadav, aged about 31 years Authorized Representative of Tata Capital Ltd. having its regional office at 9th Floor, Videocon Tower, Block E 1, Jhandewalan Extension, New Delhi-110055 the above named Deponent do hereby solemnly affirm and declare as under: 1. That I am the Authorized Representative of the Petitioner Company in the above noted case and well conversant with the facts and circumstances of the same, hence competent to swear the present affidavit. 2. That the copy of the entire paper book along the all· annexur