Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2025

Bombay High Court · 2025-09-03

TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD. vs VINAY SAH INSURANCE OMBUDSMAN PUNE AND ANR

Citation / case number
WP/1244/2023
Court
Bombay High Court
Petitioner
TATA AIG GENERAL INSURANCE CO.LTD.
Respondent
VINAY SAH INSURANCE OMBUDSMAN PUNE AND ANR
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

Neeta Sawant WP-1244-2023(2).docx-fc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1244 OF 2023 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 830 OF 2023 TATA AIG General Insurance Co. Ltd. …..Petitioner : Versus : 1. Vinay Sah, Insurance Ombudsman, Pune (state of Maharashtra except Mumbai Metro) 2. Gauri V. Raut ….Respondents Ms. Maithili Parikh with Mr. Nabeel Malik & Ms. Sanjana Sapra i/b. Tuli & Co. for the Petitioner. Mr. Avinash Fatangare with Ms. Archana Shelar, for Respondent No.2. CORAM : SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. DATED : 3 SEPTEMBER 2025. JUDGMENT : 1) This an unfortunate case, where all three male members of the family passed away in a short span of 6 months leaving behind the family in penury. The widow’s claim towards insurance availed by her husband as a part of package of housing loan availed for purchase of their home, is repudiated by the Petitioner insurance company. Due to widow’s inability to repay the housing loan, the finance company has attached the flat for sale. The Insurance Ombudsman has allowed the claim preferred by the widow and has directed Petitioner to pay to her the claim ________________________________________________________