SUSHIL @ LALLA vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~69 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 02.09.2025 + CRL.M.C. 6168/2025 SUSHIL @ LALLA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sandeep Mishra, Advocate with Petitioner in person. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Nawal Kishore Jha, APP for State with SI Gayatri, PS E-Block, Security and SI Priyanka Saini, PS Bindapur. Mr. Manoj Kumar, Advocate for R-2 with R-2 in person. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. Petitioner seeks quashing of case FIR No. 103/2018 of PS Bindapur for offence under Section 354/354A/354B/323/34 IPC on the ground that the complainant de facto (respondent no.2) has compromised the disputes with the petitioner. 2. Respondent no.2 present with her counsel and identified by IO/SI Gayatri accepts notice. Learned APP accepts notice and submits that State has no serious objection to this petition. CRL.M.C.6168/2025 Page 1 of 2 pages Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, Signature Not Verified GIRISH 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec4 5569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, KATHPALIA postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15 570996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e 26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Digitally Signed Date: 2025.09.02 17:14:40 -07'00' By:NEETU N NAIR Signing Date:02.09.2025 18:32:03 3. Keeping in mind the nature of allegations, I spoke with the parties in Hindi. It is submitted by them that respondent no.2, who was a tenant under the petitioner has now vacated the tenanted premises and they have resolved all their disputes amicably with the intervention of common family friends. Respondent no.2 submits that towards full and final settlement, the petitioner had to pay her Rs. 18,000/-, out of