Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-09-17

SURVESH R vs STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ORS

Citation / case number
CRL.M.C.-6611/2025 2025:DHC:8225
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
SURVESH R
Respondent
STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ORS

Judgment text excerpt

$~68 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 17.09.2025 ,,,,,,,,,, + CRL.M.C. 6611/2025 & CRL.M.A. 27834/2025 EXEMPTION SURVESH R .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Navlendu Kumar and Mr. Anupam Kumar, Adv. Petitioner in person. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ORS .....Respondents Through: Ms. Kiran Bairwa, APP with SI Sandeep, P.S.Vikaspuri. Mr. Trilok Singh, Adv. for R-2 and R-3. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA JUDGMENT(ORAL) RAVINDER DUDEJA, J. 1. This is a petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, seeking quashing of FIR No. 34/2020, dated 19.01.2020, registered at P.S Vikaspuri, Delhi under Sections 279 IPC & 185 of Motor Vehicle Act, 1954 and all proceedings emanating therefrom on the basis of settlement between the parties. 2. As per allegations made in the FIR, on 19.01.2020, a Maruti Swift VDI (DL8CA W4654) driven by petitioner under the influence of alcohol collided into parked car (DL-3CBP-8394) of respondent no. 2 outside his residence causing extensive damage worth over Rs. 10 CRL.M.C. 6611/2025 Page 1 of 4 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:VAISHALI PRUTHI Signing Date:18.09.2025 11:12:11 lakhs. Chargesheet has since been filed under sections 279 IPC & 185 of Motor Vehicle Act, 1954 against the petitioner. Respondent no.2 is the complainant and respondent no. 3 is stated to be the registered owner of Car No. DL-3CBP-8394 3. During the course of proceedings, the parties amicably resolved their disputes and have recorded his statements on 04.02.2023 before the court of Ld. MM-08, and on 08.07.2023 before the Ld. MM-05, South West, Dwarka in Cr. Case No. 1982/2020. In view of the aforesaid settlement petitioner has paid Rs. 40,000/- (Rupees Forty Thousand only) as compensation to the complainant. C

SURVESH R vs STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ORS · Niyam