SURENDER KUMAR GARG vs THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI

Judgment text excerpt

$~80 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 18th September, 2025 + BAIL APPLN. 2206/2025 SURENDER KUMAR GARG S/O SHRI BIR BHAN GARG R/O H.No.B-155, M.P. ENCLAVE, PITAMPURA, SARASWATI VIHAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Rakesh Chahar and Mr. Naveen Chauhan, Advocates. versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI THROUGH SHO, PS ASHOK VIHAR .....Respondent Through: Mr. Shoaib Haider, APP for the State. Mr. Vikram Panwar and Mr. Anirudh Gulati, Advocates for Complainant. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA J U D G M E N T (oral) 1. Bail Application under Section 482 Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (hereinafter referred to as “BNSS”) has been filed on behalf of the Applicant, Surender Kumar Garg seeking Anticipatory Bail in case FIR No. 0305/2025 dated 25.05.2025 registered under Sections 420/468 Indian Penal Code, 1860 at P.S. Ashok Vihar. 2. It is submitted that the Anticipatory Bail Application filed before the Ld. ASJ, has been dismissed on 03.06.2025. The Applicant is a law-binding Signature Not Verified DigitallySigned By:RITA SHARMA BAIL APPLN. 2206/2025 Page 1 of 7 Signing Date:23.09.2025 19:03:19 citizen and is a permanent resident with deep roots in society and there is no apprehension of his fleeing from justice. 3. The brief facts of the case are that the Complainant Subhash Jain, filed a Complaint before Ld. CJM alleging that Applicant, a close relative defrauded him of Rs.1.52 crores in cash in April, 2019 for allotment of plot supported by forged documents. Rs.40 lakhs were returned by Umang Garg, son of the Applicant leaving an outstanding balance of Rs.1.12 crores. It is claimed that in support of his assertions, the Complainant had filed self- attested WhatsApp chats and the alleged forged documents with no bank record to sub