Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-09-10

SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. 375 of 2025 at Lucknow

Citation / case number
SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. 375 of 2025 at Lucknow
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. 375 of 2025 at Lucknow
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. - 375 of 2025 Sarvesh Kumar .....Appellant(s) Versus State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Revenue Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Appellant(s) : Kapil Dev Chaubey, Amit Bhardwaj, Hriday Narain Tiwari, Manohar Lal Syal Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Court No. - 1 HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J. HON'BLE MANJIVE SHUKLA, J. 1. This is an application seeking condonation of delay in filing the appeal. 2. Heard. 3. The cause shown for the delay in filing the appeal is sufficient. The application is allowed and the delay in filing the appeal is condoned. (Order on Special Appeal) 4. This is an appeal directed against the judgment and order dated 07.04.2025 passed in Writ-A No.6764 of 2005. 5. Admittedly, the appellant has not worked after 28.02.1996. Prior to it, as claimed, he was engaged as Peon on daily wages in the office of Settlement Officer, Consolidation, Lakhimpur-Kheri albeit in lieu of regular employee, who had gone on leave. The writ petition was filed in the year 2005 seeking a mandamus for allowing him to work and also to appoint him afresh in the light of annexure-4, according to which the posts of pe

SPECIAL APPEAL DEFECTIVE No. 375 of 2025 at Lucknow · Niyam