SOUMYA BHATTACHARYA vs SUDHIR KUMAR THAKUR & ORS.

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on: 01.09.2025 Judgment delivered on: 18.09.2025 CM(M) 757/2022 & CM APPL. 33618/2022 SOUMYA BHATTACHARYA .....Petitioner versus SUDHIR KUMAR THAKUR & ORS. .....Respondent Memo of Appearance For the Petitioner: Mr. Sugata Shankar Roy, Advocate For the Respondent: Mr. A.K. Thakur, Mr. Rishi Raj and Mr. Sujeet Kumar, Advocates for R-1 to R-3 Mr. Sanjoy Kumar Ghosh, Mr. Prabir Basu and Ms. Rupali S. Ghosh, Advocates for R-4 & R-5 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN JUDGMENT MANOJ JAIN, J 1. It needs to be seen whether Dr. Sudhir Kumar Thakur (respondent no. 1 herein) has any locus to file consumer complaint in question or not. 2. Let me take note of the relevant facts. 3. Mr. Shambhu Nath Thakur (younger brother of the complainant) was an engineer who graduated from BITS, Pilani. He had been working as General Manager in M/s Texmaco Ltd. He was suffering from multiple black patches on his skin and was bleeding also and, therefore, the concerned doctor, on the rolls of his employer, advised him certain tests/investigations which were conducted on 07.04.2010. Test report indicated platelet counts to be 17000/cmm and since s