Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-09-02

SONU & ORS. vs THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR

Citation / case number
CRL.M.C.-5108/2025 2025:DHC:7651
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
SONU & ORS.
Respondent
THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR

Judgment text excerpt

$~23 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 02.09.2025 + CRL.M.C. 5108/2025 & CRL.M.A. 22106/2025 SONU & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Raghav Mehdiratta and Mr. Saksham, Advocates. versus THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Nawal Kishore Jha, APP for State with SI Vinay Sangwan. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. Petitioners seek quashing of case FIR No. 527/2016 of PS Khyala for offence under Section 498A/406/34 IPC on the ground that the complainant de facto (respondent no.2) has compromised the disputes with the petitioners. 2. Respondent no.2, identified by IO/SI Vinay Sangwan is present in court. Detailed statements of parties have already been recorded by the concerned Joint Registrar. State has no serious objection to this petition. 3. I have spoken with respondent no.2 in Hindi. It is stated by her that all CRL.M.C.5108/2025 Page 1 of 2 pages Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA GIRISH DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec4556 9af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, KATHPALIA postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d155709 Signature Not Verified 96b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2025.09.02 17:11:13 -07'00' Digitally Signed By:NEETU N NAIR Signing Date:02.09.2025 18:32:03 her disputes with the petitioners stand resolved amicably and she has received complete full and final settlement amount in lieu of her stridhan and alimony. It is stated by her that marriage between her and petitioner no.1 stands dissolved by decree of divorce and no child was born out of their wedlock. Respondent no.2 submits that she does not wish to pursue prosecution of petitioners. 4. Having spok

SONU & ORS. vs THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR · Niyam