SMT SUMEDHA CHOPRA vs SHRI SHITAL KUMAR BHANDARI & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~107 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 24.09.2025 + CM(M) 1884/2025, CM APPL. 60256/2025, 60257/2025 & 60258/2025 SMT SUMEDHA CHOPRA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Saurabh Suman Sinha, Advocate versus SHRI SHITAL KUMAR BHANDARI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Anand Kumar Dubey, Advocate (through videoconferencing). CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The petitioner/defendant has assailed order dated 03.07.2025 of the learned trial court whereby application under Section 151 CPC filed by the respondents/plaintiffs seeking clarification/revival/restoration and listing of the suit was allowed after detailed discussion. 2. Having heard learned counsel for petitioner/defendant, I do not find it a fit case to issue notice, though learned counsel for respondents/plaintiffs has appeared through videoconferencing on advance intimation. CM(M) 1884/2025 Page 1 of 4 pages Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA Signature Not Verified GIRISH DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec455 69af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, KATHPALIA postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d1557 0996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa, Digitally Signed cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2025.09.24 17:55:39 -07'00' By:NEETU N NAIR Signing Date:24.09.2025 17:52:45 3. Broadly speaking, the circumstances relevant for present purposes are that the present respondents filed a suit against the present petitioner/defendant for recovery of possession of the tenanted premises and rent/mesne profits. In the normal course of events, after partly decreeing of the suit under Order XII Rule 6 CPC for possession of the tenanted premises, the trial court would have proceeded further with the trial on