Bombay High Court · 2025-09-03
SIMRAN INDERJEET SINGH KAUR vs STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE OFFICE OF THE GOVERNMENT PLEADER
- Citation / case number
- WP/3568/2025
- Court
- Bombay High Court
- Petitioner
- SIMRAN INDERJEET SINGH KAUR
- Respondent
- STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH THE OFFICE OF THE GOVERNMENT PLEADER
Judgment text excerpt
wpl 15555-25.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 15555 OF 2025 Simran Inderjeet Singh Kaur Age-25 years, Occ.- Student, R/at C-17, 2nd Floor, New Krishna Park, Vikas Puri, Delhi, India – 110 018. … Petitioner Versus 1. State of Maharashtra Through the office of the Government Pleader 2. Narsee Monjee Institute of Management Studie, School of Business Management, V. L. Mehta Road, Vile Parle (West), Mumbai – 400 056 ... Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 15565 OF 2025 Tushar Bhupinder Kumar Batra Age-23 years, Occ.- Student, R/at House No. 636, Sector 7, Block-B, Faridabad, Haryana-121 006. … Petitioner Versus 1. State of Maharashtra Through the office of the Government Pleader 2. Narsee Monjee Institute of Management Studie, School of Business Management, V. L. Mehta Road, Vile Parle (West), Mumbai – 400 056 ... Respondents …………. Mr. Aneesa Cheema a/w. Mr. Arshil Shah, Ms. Smita Durve, Ms. Bhairavi P., Ms. Yukta P., Mr. Yash K. i/b Arshil Shah for the Petitioners. Mr. Gaurav Srivastav a/w. Ms. Manorama Mohanty, Ms. Malika Mondal, Mr. Hitanshu Jain i/b Mr. S. K. Srivastav & Co. for the Respondent No.2. Mr. Atul Vanarse, AGP for the Respondent-State in WPL 15555/25. Mr. Rakesh Pathak, AGP for the Respondent-State in WPL 15565/25. Amk 1/21 wpl 15555-25.doc CORAM : M. S. KARNIK AND N. R. BORKAR, J. DATE : 03.09.2025 JUDGMENT (Per M. S. Karnik, J.) 1. The petitions were last heard on 05.08.2025 and posted for Judgment. The petitions are disposed of by common Judgment and order as the issues involved are common. We refer to the facts in Writ Petition (L) No. 15555 of 2025 for convenience. The petitioner is challenging the decision dated 25.03.2025 and the impugned email dated 24.03.2025 whereby the petitioner’s