Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-09-22

SHASHANK SHEKHAR PANDEY vs UNION OF INDIA & ANR.

Citation / case number
W.P.(C)-5690/2025 2025:DHC:8404
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
SHASHANK SHEKHAR PANDEY
Respondent
UNION OF INDIA & ANR.
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

$~J-1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Delivered on: 22.09.2025 W.P.(C) 5690/2025 & CM APPL. 25989/2025 SHASHANK SHEKHAR PANDEY .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Shivam Pandey, Mr. Priyanshu Upadhyay, Mr. Abhinav Sharma and Mr. Gangesh Kumar Jha, Advs. Versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Khanna, SC for NTA with Ms. Pragya Bhushan, Mr. Tarandeep Singh, Ms. Vilakshana Dayma, Ms. Pankhuri Srivastava and Ms. Alekshendra Sharma, Advs. for NTA. Ms. Avshreya Pratap Singh Rudy, Ms. Usha Jamnal, Ms. Harshita Chaturvedi, Advs. with Experts Mr. S. Shree Vishnoo and Mr. Subodh S. for NCFL. Mr. Neeraj, SPC with Mr. Vedansh Anand, GP with Mr. Soumyadip Chakraborty, Adv. for UOI. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN JUDGMENT VIKAS MAHAJAN, J 1. The present petition has been filed seeking following reliefs: “(a)Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, including a writ of mandamus, directing the Respondent to rectify the 2. The case set out in the present petition is that petitioner herein 2025. Upon downloading his response sheet, petitioner discovered that the value of number of questions attempted and un- attempted were inverted inasmuch as 2