SH VIPUL AGGARWAL vs MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ORS

Judgment text excerpt

$~67 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 09.09.2025 + W.P.(C) 13768/2025, CM APPL. 56441/2025 & CM APPL. 56442/2025 SH VIPUL AGGARWAL .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Vani Garg, Mr. Vaibhav Bharti, Advocates (M:9654647652) versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI AND ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Rohit Kathuria, Mr. Dhruv Varma, Advocates for R-1 and 2/MCD (M:9717948948) CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA MINI PUSHKARNA, J. (ORAL) 1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking directions to respondent nos. 1 and 2, not to take action for demolition and sealing of the property bearing no. 89, South Anarkali Extension, Delhi-110051. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that respondent no. 3 had earlier filed a writ petition before this Court, i.e., W.P.(C) 9734/2024, titled as “Har Bhagwan Sharma Versus Municipal Corporation of Delhi & Ors.”, which was disposed of vide order dated 11th September, 2024. Thus, it is submitted that pursuant thereto, action has already been taken by the respondent nos. 1 and 2 – Municipal Corporation of Delhi (“MCD”), and the unauthorized construction in the property in question, has been demolished on three instances, on 11th August, 2025, 19th August, 2025 and 28th August, Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:HARIOM SHARMA Signing Date:09.09.2025 21:34:55 2025. 3. Thus, it is submitted that necessary demolition action against the unauthorized construction in the property in question has already been taken by the MCD, however, further Vacation Notice dated 13th August, 2025 and a Show Cause Notice dated 14th August, 2025, have been served upon the petitioner. 4. It is submitted that no further construction is going on in the property in question. Thus, it is submitted that further action may