Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-09-19

SALMAN SAYEED SIDDIQUI vs STATE (NCT OF DELHI)

Citation / case number
BAIL APPLN.-2694/2025 2025:DHC:8307
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
SALMAN SAYEED SIDDIQUI
Respondent
STATE (NCT OF DELHI)

Judgment text excerpt

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Reserved on: 16th September, 2025 Pronounced on: 19th September, 2025 + BAIL APPLN. 2694/2025 SALMAN SAYEED SIDDIQUI C/o Yaqub Siddiqui, R/o 18E/23A/1 Karamat Ki Chowki Kareli, GTB Nagar, Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh- 211016 .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Divyesh Pratap Singh and Mr. Amit Sangwan, Advocates. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) Through Station House Officer, Police Station - Outer North District .....Respondent Through: Mr. Utkarsh, APP for the State. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA J U D G M E N T NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J. 1. First regular bail Application under Section 483 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 has been filed on behalf of the Applicant/Salman Sayeed Siddiqui in FIR No. 0047/2024 registered under Sections 318(4)/3(5) BNS at Cyber Police Station. 2. The Bail Application filed before the Learned ASJ has been dismissed on 11.07.2025. The Applicant has submitted that he is a law-abiding citizen, who was arrested on 06.04.2025 solely on the basis of the confessional statement of co-accused Rohit Rajaram Ghanekar. The Chargesheet has Signature Not Verified Signed By:VIKAS BAIL APPLN. 2694/2025 Page 1 of 9 ARORA Signing Date:19.09.2025 19:29:03 already been filed against all the Accused persons, on 26.05.2025. 3. The entire cheating amount, i.e., Rs.47,688/- was received in the bank account of co-accused Swapnil Dattaram, which was not credited/transferred to any other bank account. Though no amount was received by the Applicant, but in order to establish his bona fide and to show his willingness to join the investigation, a sum of Rs.48,000 has already been paid to the Complainant with a view to amicably resolve the matter. 4. The beneficiary in the present case has not been arrested and the

SALMAN SAYEED SIDDIQUI vs STATE (NCT OF DELHI) · Niyam