Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-09-09

SAKSHI & ANR. vs RADHEY SHYAM & ANR.

Citation / case number
CM(M)-1261/2025 2025:DHC:7861
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
SAKSHI & ANR.
Respondent
RADHEY SHYAM & ANR.
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 09.09.2025 CM(M) 1261/2025 & CM APPL. 42063/2025 SAKSHI & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Sarthak Sisodia, Advocate. versus RADHEY SHYAM & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Vishaka and Mr. Anuj Kumar, Advocates. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. Petitioners (defendants in suit) have challenged order dated 12.03.2025 of learned trial court whereby, their defence was struck off for the reason that for past few dates petitioner no.1 had not been appearing for concluding her cross-examination. I have heard learned counsel for both sides. 2. Broadly speaking, in the impugned order, the learned trial court observed that the present petitioner no.1 had not come forward for further cross-examination after 05.12.2023 and had been seeking adjournments on one or the other ground, which conveyed that she is intentionally delaying the matter and that calls for adverse action. After observing that, the learned CM(M) 1261/2025 pages GIRISH 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45569af3962c6fb483 5d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, KATHPALIA postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e867964