SAGAR UJJWAL@UDHAM vs STATE NCT OF DELHI

Judgment text excerpt

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Reserved on:29.08.2025 Date of Decision:09.09.2025 + BAIL APPLN. 1707/2025 SAGAR UJJWAL@UDHAM .....Petitioner Through: Ms. Anu Narula, Adv. versus STATE NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Raghuinder Verma, APP for State with Mr. Aditya Vikram Singh, Adv. with Inspector Chote Lal Daughter of deceased (through VC) CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AJAY DIGPAUL JUDGMENT % 1. The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant/petitioner/accused seeking regular bail under Section 483 read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 20231 in case arising out of FIR No. 532/2023. Factual Matrix 2. FIR No. 532/2023, at PS - Sarai Rohilla, was registered on 05.07.2023 for offences under Sections 302/506 of the Indian Penal Code, 18602 and 1 hereinafter “BNSS” 2 hereinafter “IPC” Signature Not Verified Signed By:SHILPI BAIL APPLN. 1707/2025 Page 1 of 9 Signing Date:09.09.2025 19:16:02 Sections 25/27/25(8) of the Arms Act, 19593 in respect of the fatal shooting of the deceased Smt. Poonam Mittal at the residence of the complainant, who is the deceased’s daughter. 3. The genesis of the offence is traced to a dispute between the complainant and one Ankit Kaushik/main accused. Ankit allegedly went to the complainant’s house and opened fire, causing fatal injuries to her mother. 4. During the course of investigation, Ankit Kaushik, in his supplementary disclosure statement, disclosed that he procured the country- made pistol used in the offence through Vijay Ujjwal and the present applicant Sagar Ujjwal @ Udham. 5. It is alleged that in early May 2023, Ankit and one Naveen visited Village Hazurabad Garhi, District Baghpat, U.P., where they met Vijay and Sagar. On 10.05.2023, Ankit purportedly transferred