ROMY MEHRA & ANR. vs GAUTAM MEHRA & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 09th September, 2025 + CS(OS) 19/2024 & I.As. 9122/2024, 41474/2024, 49093-94/2024 ROMY MEHRA & ANR. .....Plaintiffs Through: Ms. Madhavi Diwan, Sr. Adv. with Ms. Natasha Garg and Mr. Anubhav Dubey, Advocates versus GAUTAM MEHRA & ANR. .....Defendants Through: Ms. Malavika Rajkotia, Mr. Mayank Grover, Ms. Aashna Talwar, Adv. for D-1 Mr. Prashant Mendiratta Ms. Poonam Mendiratta and Ms. Neha Jain, Advs. for D-2 with D-2 in person CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA % JUDGMENT MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J: I.A. 546/2024, I.A. 6586/2024 and I.A No. 41474/2024 1. I.A. 546/2024 is an application under Order XXXIX Rules 1 and 2 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [‘CPC’], initially filed by the plaintiffs with the suit seeking an ad interim injunction in favour of the plaintiffs, directing the defendants to vacate the property bearing House No. A-20, Ansal Villas, Satbari, Chhatarpur, New Delhi-110074 [‘suit property’] along with their Signature Not Verified Signed By:MAHIMA CS(OS) 19/2024 Page 1 of 33 SHARMA Signing Date:09.09.2025 18:49:05 belongings and restraining the defendant no. 2 from entering the suit property. 2. I.A. 6586/2024 is an application under Section 151 of CPC seeking direction to defendant no. 2 to immediately vacate the suit property and consequently decide I.A. 546/2024. 3. I.A. 41474/2024 is an application under Section 151 of CPC seeking early hearing of the captioned suit and I.A. 546/2024. CASE SET UP BY THE PLAINTIFFS 4. Ms. Madhavi Diwan, learned senior counsel for the plaintiffs, has set up the plaintiffs’ case as under: - 4.1. The suit property is an exclusive and self-acquired property of the plaintiff no. 1, acquired vide registered sale deed dated 24.01.2005. T