RAJENDER PRASAD SHARMA vs COURT OF CHIEF COMMISSIONER FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES (DIVYANGJAN) & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~1 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Decided on: 17.09.2025 + W.P.(C) 8069/2022 RAJENDER PRASAD SHARMA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Karan Luthra, Mr. Rohan Dua, Mr. Piyush T., Advocates. versus COURT OF CHIEF COMMISSIONER FOR PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES (DIVYANGJAN) & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Naginder Benipal, SPC with Mr. Ankit Siwach, Mr. J. Singh, Mr. Arjun Baliyan, Advocates for R-1. Mr. Dhairya Gupta, Advocate for R-2. CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN PRATEEK JALAN, J. (ORAL) 1. By way of this writ petition, under Article 226 of the Constitution, the petitioner assails an order of the Court of Chief Commissioner for Persons with Disabilities (Divyangjan) dated 23.10.2020, by which the Commissioner has rejected a complaint filed by the petitioner against his employer, respondent No.2 herein – Jones Lang LaSalle Building Operations Pvt. Ltd [“Company”]. 2. I have heard Mr. Karan Luthra, learned counsel for the petitioner, and Mr. Dhairya Gupta, learned counsel for respondent No. 2 – Company. 3. The petitioner joined the services of respondent No. 2 – Company as an Electrical Engineer on 01.06.2014. In terms of the appointment letter, he was deployed to a site in Noida, Uttar Pradesh, where the Signature Not Verified Signed By:UMANG W.P.(C) 8069/2022 Page 1 of 9 KHANNA Signing Date:19.09.2025 12:34:58 Company was providing facilities management services. The appointment letter specified that his place of work may be changed from time to time. It also contained a clause permitting termination by either party on one month’s written notice, subject to certain further conditions. 4. On 04.08.2017, the Company issued a warning letter to the petitioner, alleging negligence of duties at the site. The petitioner’s response dated 16.08.2017 reflects