Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2025

Allahabad High Court · 2025-09-25

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. 984 of 2025 at Lucknow

Citation / case number
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. 984 of 2025 at Lucknow
Court
Allahabad High Court
Petitioner
PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. 984 of 2025 at Lucknow
Respondent
Unknown
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 984 of 2025 Janak Ram .....Petitioner(s) Versus State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue Deptt. Lko. And 7 Others .....Respondent(s) Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ambrish Kumar Pandey, Reependra Gupta Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Mohan Singh Court No. - 6 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned Counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel. 2. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner claiming himself to be the public spirited person. 3. In paragraph 4, it has been stated by the petitioner that it is only in the public interest, the present petition has been filed. The relief as sought is for a direction to direct the opposite parties to vacate the Khadanja Marg situated over Gata No.535/0.563 hectare and to remove the wall made on public way. 4. Learned Standing Counsel based upon the instructions, which are taken on record, states that the father of the petitioner and the opposite party no.5 are relative to each other. It also transpires that a statement of the father of the petitioner was recorded with regard to the relationship and personal dispute in between the pa

PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. 984 of 2025 at Lucknow · Niyam