Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-09-11

PRATIBHA vs UNION OF INDIA & ANR.

Citation / case number
LPA-704/2024 2025:DHC:8247-DB
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
PRATIBHA
Respondent
UNION OF INDIA & ANR.
Search all judgments

Judgment text excerpt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 11th SEPTEMBER, 2025 IN THE MATTER OF: LPA 704/2024 PRATIBHA .....Appellant Through: Mr. Zahid Ali, Adv. versus UNION OF INDIA & ANR ......Respondents Through: Mr. Rajkumar Yadav (SPC), Ms. Rita Laha, Mr. Ratna Ujjwal Saha Advs for R-1 Mr Rajesh Mahindru Advocate for R- 2 CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIMAL KUMAR YADAV JUDGMENT (ORAL) 1. Appellant has approached this Court by challenging the Order dated 19.09.2023, passed by the learned Single Judge of this Court in W.P.(C) 12330/2023. 2. Shorn of unnecessary details, the facts, leading to the present Appeal are as under:- a. The Appellant was appointed as Apprentice Development Officer with the Respondent No.2 herein on 26.11.2019. On 31.01.2020, the Appellant herein was appointed as Probationary Development Officer with the Respondent No.2. The said 2021. The said letter also laid down the fresh targets to be achieved by the Appellant herein. d. Vide letter dated 24.11.2021, once again the Appellant herein was informed that her performance has not been up to the mark and she hasn’t met the assigned targets. However, once again, a lenient

PRATIBHA vs UNION OF INDIA & ANR. · Niyam