PRAMOD KUMAR vs THAE STATE GNCT OF DELHI AND ANR

Judgment text excerpt

$~38 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 23.09.2025 ,,,,,,,,,, + CRL.M.C. 2971/2024 & CRL.M.A. 11378/2024 EXEMPTION FROM FILING CERTIFIED COPIES PRAMOD KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Anand Mishra, Adv. with petitioner in person. versus THE STATE GNCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Tarang Srivastav, APP with SI Vivek Kumar, PS Barakhamba Road. R-2 in person. CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA JUDGMENT(ORAL) RAVINDER DUDEJA, J. 1. This is a petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, seeking quashing of FIR No. 188/2014, dated 10.12.2014, registered at P.S Barakhamba Road, Delhi under Sections 279/337 IPC and all proceedings emanating therefrom on the basis of settlement between the parties. 2. As per allegations made in the FIR, on 10.12.2014, a collusion occurred between respondent no. 2’s bike (DL6SAF7953) and petitioner’s car (DL3CBR5684), leading to injuries to respondent no. CRL.M.C. 2971/2024 Page 1 of 4 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:VAISHALI PRUTHI Signing Date:24.09.2025 13:31:19 2. Chargesheet has since been filed under sections 279/338 IPC against the petitioner. 3. During the course of proceedings, the parties amicably resolved their disputes before the Delhi Mediation Centre, Patiala House Court, New Delhi and executed a Mediation Settlement dated 23.09.2023. In view of the aforesaid settlement petitioner has paid Rs. 1,00,000/- (Rupees One Lac only) as compensation to respondent no. 2/ complainant. Copy of Mediation Settlement dated 23.09.2023 has been annexed as Annexure C. Offence under section 338 IPC has since been compounded with the petitioner before the Trial Court. 4. Parties are physically present Court. They have been identified by their respective counse