PRAMOD K. SAINI vs O. P. BHARGAVA THRU LRS

Judgment text excerpt

$~84 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 16.09.2025 + CM(M) 1820/2025, CM APPL. 58544/2025 & CM APPL. 58543/2025 PRAMOD K. SAINI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Vinod Kumar Singh and Mr. Manuvendra Singh, Advocates. versus O. P. BHARGAVA THROUGH LRS .....Respondents Through: None. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. The petitioner (defendant in the suit) has assailed order dated 18.08.2025 of the learned trial court, whereby his application under Section 151 CPC for directions to send his own document, already exhibited as Ex.DW2/A, to CFSL was dismissed. 2. Having heard learned counsel for petitioner, I do not find it a fit case to even issue notice. Rather, the petition appears to be a mischievous effort of petitioner to somehow protract the disposal of the suit, which is pending at the stage of final arguments since the year 2018. CM(M) 1820/2025 Page 1 of 5 pages GIRISH Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, Signature Not Verified 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45569af3962c6fb4835 d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, KATHPALIA postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15570996b40f80cbd2eee 60402c487965ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2025.09.16 17:17:41 -07'00' Digitally Signed By:NEETU N NAIR Signing Date:16.09.2025 17:27:18 3. Broadly speaking, in the money recovery suit filed in the year 2013 by the father of present respondents against the petitioner, the trial stood concluded after the present petitioner examined two witnesses and closed Defendant’s Evidence on 10.08.2018. Thereafter, the petitioner/defendant filed an application for sending his own document, Ex.DW2/A to CFSL in order to test the genuineness of signatures of the now de