PRAJAKTA SIDDHESH PARALKAR vs SIDDHESH PARALKAR

Judgment text excerpt

903-WP-19157-2024.DOC IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Digitally signed by ARJUN WRIT PETITION NO.19157 OF 2024 ARJUN VITTHAL VITTHAL KUDHEKAR KUDHEKAR Date: 2025.09.20 Prajakta Siddhesh Paralkar …Petitioner 21:34:36 +0530 Versus Siddhesh Paralkar …Respondent Mr. Abhijeet Sarvate, for the Petitioner. Mr. P. D. Prasad Rao (through Video Conferencing) a/w. Ms. Devika Purav, for the Respondent. Ms. Seema Sarnaik, Senior Advocate a/w. Ms. Preeti Walimbe. CORAM: MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J. DATED : 16th SEPTEMBER 2025 PC: 1. Mr. Abhijeet Sarvate, learned Counsel appears for the Petitioner and Mr. P. D. Prasad Rao, learned Counsel along with Ms. Devika Purav appears for the Respondent, who have now instructions to appear for the Respondent. 2. In this Writ Petition, the Petitioner-Wife has challenged the order dated 7th November 2024 passed by the learned Judge, Family Court No.9, Pune below Exhibit-96 in P. A. No.363 of 2020. In the said application bearing Exhibit-96 inter alia the Petitioner has sought the relief that one half of the sale-consideration of subject flat, after deduction of the loan amount, be directed to be Page 1 Sonali 903-WP-19157-2024.DOC deposited in the Court. The said application has been dismissed by the impugned Order dated 7th November 2024. 3. It is necessary to set out certain factual aspects :- i. By Order dated 5th September 2020 passed by the learned Judge, Family Court No.4, Pune below Exhibit-5 in Petition A No.363 of 2020 inter alia the relief sought of temporary injunction is rejected. The relief sought in the said Exhibit-5 application is that by temporary injunction, the Respondent be directed not to sell the subject flat. The learned Trial Court while dismissing the said application has taken into considera