PRADIP RAMESH SHINDE vs MALEGAON MUNICIPAL CORPORATION MALEGAON

Judgment text excerpt

WP.7949.2025+Group.doc Ajay IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 7949 OF 2025 Pradip Ramesh Shinde .. Petitioner Versus Malegaon Municipal Corporation, Malegaon .. Respondent WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 8004 OF 2025 Bhushan Suresh Thakre .. Petitioner Versus Malegaon Municipal Corporation, Malegaon .. Respondent WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 7951 OF 2025 Sunil Ananda Bagul .. Petitioner Versus Malegaon Municipal Corporation, Malegaon .. Respondent WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 7954 OF 2025 Sheikh Javid Sheikh Rashid .. Petitioner Versus Malegaon Municipal Corporation, Malegaon .. Respondent ....................  Ms. Pavitra Manesh, Advocate for Petitioners.  Mr. S.S. Patwardhan, Advocate for Respondent - Corporation. ......…........... CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J. DATE : SEPTEMBER 30, 2025. JUDGMENT: 1. Heard Ms. Manesh, learned Advocate for Petitioners and Mr. Patwardhan, learned Advocate for Respondent - Corporation. 1 of 31 WP.7949.2025+Group.doc 2. This is a group of four Writ Petitions which are decided by this common judgment. By consent of parties, Writ Petitions are heard and disposed of finally. Facts are almost identical in all four cases concerning Petitioners - Employees and Respondent - Malegaon Municipal Corporation (for short 'the said Corporation'). 3. Facts in Writ Petition No.7949 of 2025 and Writ Petition No.8004 of 2025 concerning Pradip Ramesh Shinde and Bhushan Suresh Thakre, who were both appointed as Driver on daily wages by appointment order dated 27.02.2017 are identical. 4. Facts in Writ Petition No.7951 of 2025 and Writ Petition No.7954 of 2025 concerning Sunil Ananda Bagul and Sheikh Javid Sheikh Rashid, who were both appointed as Firemen on daily wages by appointment order dated 07.04.2017 are identical. 5