PINKI vs THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI

Judgment text excerpt

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Pronounced on: 27th September, 2025 + BAIL APPLN.3432/2024 PINKI .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sunil K Mittal, Mr. Pushpender Dhakka, Mr. Kshitij Mittal, Mr. Anshul Mittal, Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Mr. Sarthak Tagra, Advocates. Vs THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Aman Usman, APP with SI Jitender Kumar, PS-J. Puri, SI Pawan, PS- Mukherjee Nagar. Mr. Sanjay Rathi, Mr. Sanchit Jaglan, Mr. Parth Khatri, Mr. Priyanshu, Advocates for complainant. + BAIL APPLN. 3878/2024 AYUSH BHEDDA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Sunil K Mittal, Mr. Pushpender Dhakka, Mr. Kshitij Mittal, Mr. Anshul Mittal, Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Mr. Sarthak Tagra, Advocates. Vs THE STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI .....Respondent Through: Mr. Aman Usman, APP with SI Jitender Kumar, PS-J. Puri, SI Pawan, PS- Mukherjee Nagar. Mr. Sanjay Rathi, Mr. Sanchit Jaglan, Mr. Parth Khatri, Mr. Priyanshu, Advocates for complainant. BAIL APPLN. 3432/2024 & BAIL APPLN. 3878/2024 Page 1 of 12 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:VAISHALI PRUTHI Signing Date:27.09.2025 16:12:40 CORAM:- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVINDER DUDEJA JUDGMENT RAVINDER DUDEJA, J. 1. These are applications under Section 482 read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [“BNSS”], filed by the petitioners seeking grant of anticipatory bail in FIR No. 492/2024 registered at Police Station Mukherjee Nagar, Delhi, under Sections 420/467/468/471/120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 [“IPC”]. Since both petitions emanate from a common set of facts and pertain to the same FIR, they are being disposed of together by this common judgment. FACTUAL BACKGROUND 2. The FIR was lodged on 03.07.2024 on a complaint by Ravinder Singh [“complainant”], who alleged that the petitioners, along with