PATANJALI AYURVED LIMITED & ANR. vs DABUR INDIA LIMITED

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + FAO(OS) (COMM) 140/2025 & CM APPL. 57929/2025 PATANJALI AYURVED LIMITED & ANR. .....Appellants Through: Mr. Rajiv Nayar, Sr. Adv. versus DABUR INDIA LIMITED .....Respondent Through: Mr. Sandeep Sethi, Sr. Adv. with Mr. R Jawahar Lal, Ms Meghna Kumar and Mr Anirudh Bakhru, Advs. CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE OM PRAKASH SHUKLA JUDGMENT(ORAL) % 23.09.2025 C.HARI SHANKAR, J. 1. By the order under challenge, a learned Single Judge has restrained the appellant, who was the defendant in the suit, in the following terms: “78. Considering the aforesaid detailed discussion, the plaintiff has established a strong prima facie case in its favour. Balance of convenience also lies in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendants. Further, the plaintiff shall suffer irreparable loss, including loss of reputation, if interim relief, as prayed in the present applications, is not granted 79. In view of the discussion hereinabove, this Court directs that from the Print Advertisements, the defendants shall delete the first two lines, i.e., ‘Why settle for Chyawanprash made with 40 herbs?’ The defendants can accordingly modi