PARDEEP SOLANKI AND ORS vs MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI ORS

Judgment text excerpt

$~97 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 25th September, 2025 + W.P.(C) 12444/2024 & CM APPL. 51811/2024 PARDEEP SOLANKI AND ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Jai Sahai Endlaw, Mr. J.V. Rana and Ms. Shruti Kapur, Advs. Mob: 9899389928 Email: [email protected] versus MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI ORS. ....Respondents Through: Mr. Manu Chaturvedi, SC for MCD. Mob: 9315827955 Email: [email protected] Mr. Roopansh Purohit and Ms. Narayani Sepaha, Advs. for R-2 to 4. Mob: 9810440322 Email: [email protected] CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA MINI PUSHKARNA, J. (Oral) 1. The present writ petition has been filed seeking quashing of the Vacation Notice dated 28th August, 2024, issued by respondent no. 1 with respect to the property at Khasra No. 446, part of Neha Green Vatika, Nasirpur Road, Manglapuri and property Adj. to Plot No. 03, Khasra No. 446, Mahavir Enclave. 2. This Court notes that when the present matter was listed for the Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed W.P.(C) 12444/2024 Page 1 of 6 By:HARIOM SHARMA Signing Date:29.09.2025 17:12:14 first time, interim protection was granted to the petitioners herein vide order dated 05th September, 2024, in the following manner: “xxx xxx xxx 1. Heard learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner who submits that the impugned action under Section 349 of the Delhi Municipal Corporation Act, 1957 [„Act‟] is not amenable to appellate authority under the Act i.e., Appellate Tribunal- Municipal Corporation of Delhi („ATMCD‟). 2. Issue notice. 3. Notice on behalf of the Corporation is accepted by Mr. Manu Chaturvedi. Let the steps be taken to serve the remaining respondents. 4. Mr. Manu Chaturvedi, on advance instructions, points out that with respect to this, in an almost sim