NILESH OJHA AND ANR. vs HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ON ITS OWN MOTION

RAMESHWAR LAXMAN DILWALE Dilwale Rameshwar Cri. IA-3297-2005- 3029-25-SMCP-1-2025.doc 9. ... CORAM: SHREE CHANDRASHEKHAR, ACJ., M. S. SONAK, RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, A. S. GADKARI & B. P. COLABAWALLA, JJ. DATE: 4th SEPTEMBER, 2025 P.C.: INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 3297 OF 2025 Not on Board. 2. With the consent of parties, taken on Board. 3. Mr. Nilesh C. Ojha, appearing in-person, states that the statements made and stand taken by him in the Discharge Applications vide Interim Application Nos.2005 of 2025 and 3209 of 2025 are adopted by him and shall form part of his reply-cum- statement of defence in compliance of the order dated 7 th August 2 Dilwale Rameshwar Cri. IA-3297-2005- 3029-25-SMCP-1-2025.doc 2025 by which he was directed to file his reply-cum-statement of defence . 4. Mr. Nilesh C. Ojha, appearing in-person referred to several judgments of which references have been made in the Interim Application No.3297 of 2025. He has laid stress on the decisions in “Sundeep Kumar Bafna v. State of Maharashtra & Anr.” (2014) 16 SCC 623 and “Bal Thackrey v. Harish Pimpalkhute” (2005) 1 SCC 254 and endeavoured to demonstrate that the decision in “Shri C. K. Daphtary & Ors. v. O. P. Gupta & Ors.