NEETU vs STATE (NCT OF DELHI)

Judgment text excerpt

$~6 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 03.09.2025 + BAIL APPLN. 3230/2025 NEETU .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Ajay Kumar and Mr. Rajat Kumar Bharti, Advs. versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) .....Respondent Through: Mr.Manoj Pant, APP for the State with Mr. Ashish Priya and Mr. Ajay Pratap Singh Chauhan, Advs. along with SI Pooja. Mr Dhruva Bhagat, Adv. for victim. CORAM: HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA JUDGMENT DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J. (Oral) CRL.M.A. 25016/2025 & CRL.M.A. 25017/2025 (exemptions) 1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. 2. Applications stand disposed of. BAIL APPLN. 3230/2025 & CRL.M.A. 25015/2025 3. The applicant, by way of this application, seeks grant of anticipatory bail in case arising out of FIR bearing no. 3230/2025, registered on 11.07.2025, at Police Station Ranjeet Nagar, Delhi for Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed BAIL APPLN. 3230/2025 Page 1 of 8 By:ZEENAT PRAVEEN Signing Date:08.09.2025 16:58:37 the commission of offences punishable under Sections 316(4) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 [hereafter „BNS‟]. 4. Brief facts of the case are that the FIR in this case came to be registered on the complaint of the complainants – Dr. Indu Khurana and Dr. Pushpinder Khurana, Directors of Kailash Nursing Home Pvt. Ltd. – who alleged that the applicant Neetu was employed in 2019 as an OPD assistant/patient coordinator, while co-accused Vikas was later employed in 2023 as a front desk executive. Over time, Neetu gained the trust of the complainants and Dr. Isha Khurana, who entrusted her with the responsibility of collecting payments, issuing receipts, maintaining patient records, and handling billing software. It is alleged that the present applicant, in collusion with co-accused Vikas, began embezzling fund