Niyam v2 is live — start for just ₹100 — 200 credits to try

september 2025

Delhi High Court · 2025-09-10

MUDIT VASHISTA vs DIVYA SHARMA & ANR.

Citation / case number
CRL.REV.P.-750/2024 2025:DHC:7926
Court
Delhi High Court
Petitioner
MUDIT VASHISTA
Respondent
DIVYA SHARMA & ANR.

Judgment text excerpt

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment delivered on: 10.09.2025 + CRL.REV.P. 489/2024 DIVYA SHARMA & ANR. .....Petitioners Through: Mr. Kartik Sandal, Mrs. Raveena Dewan Sandal, Mr. Rohan Sandal and Ms. Jhanavi Dewan, Advocates versus MUDIT VASHISHTHA .....Respondent Through: Ms. Sonali Sharma and Ms. Toshiba Sharma, Advocates. + CRL.REV.P. 750/2024 & CRL.M.A. 29832/2024 MUDIT VASHISTA .....Petitioner Through: Mr. R.K. Mehta, Mr. Anshuman Gupta and Mr. Ajay Jawatkar, Advocates. versus DIVYA SHARMA & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Kartik Sandal, Mrs. Raveena Dewan Sandal, Mr. Rohan Sandal and Ms. Jhanavi Dewan, Advocates Mr. Sanjay Padam Jain and Mr. Vinay Kumar Bhasin, Advocates for R-3. CRL.REV.P. 489/2024 & connected matter Page 1 of 10 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:ZEENAT PRAVEEN Signing Date:12.09.2025 15:42:59 CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA JUDGMENT DR. SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J 1. Vide this common judgment, this Court shall dispose of the cross-petitions filed by the petitioner and the respondent who are legally wedded to each other. By way of both these petitions, the parties assail the order dated 16.02.2024 [hereafter „impugned order‟], passed by the learned Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, South-West District, Dwarka Courts, Delhi [hereafter „Family Court‟] in M.T. No. 402/2021 titled „Divya Sharma vs. Mudit Vashist‟. 2. In CRL.REV.P. 489/2024, the petitioner-wife seeks grant of the following prayers: “a. Allow the Revision Petition and modify the order Dated 16.02.2024 Passed by LD. Sh. Vipin Kumar Rai, Additional Principal Judge, Family Court, South-West Dwarka, New Delhi. b. Allow the present revision and enhance the maintenance awarded to the Petitioner.” 3. Conversely, in CRL.REV.P. 750/2024, the p

MUDIT VASHISTA vs DIVYA SHARMA & ANR. · Niyam