MS. SWASTI OJHA vs SH CHARANJIT RAMGARIA

Judgment text excerpt

$~ * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment Pronounced on: 22.09.2025 + RFA(COMM) 92/2023 MS. SWASTI OJHA ..... APPELLANT Versus SH. CHARANJIT RAMGARIA ..... RESPONDENT Advocates who appeared in this case For the Appellant : Mr. Shashi Shekhar Pandey, Advocate. For the Respondent : Mr. Amit Vohra and Ms. Simran, Advocates CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V. KAMESWAR RAO HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD KUMAR JUDGMENT VINOD KUMAR, J. 1. This Regular First Appeal is directed against a judgment and decree dated 14.11.2022 passed by learned District Judge (Commercial Court)-01, West District, Delhi vide which civil suit CS (COMM.) No. 59/2019 filed by the respondent for recovery of Rs.5,79,444/- was decreed. 2. For the sake of convenience, the appellant would also be referred to as ‘defendant’ and the respondent as ‘plaintiff’. Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:PRAMOD RFA (COMM) 92/2023 Page 1 of 23 KUMAR VATS Signing Date:25.09.2025 10:33:28 3. For the disposal of this appeal, it is necessary to refer to the pleadings and evidence led by parties before the Trial Court. Plaint 4. As per the plaint, plaintiff is a contractor dealing in business of civil, interiors, electrical works from its office at B3/10, Rajouri Garden, New Delhi. The defendant is a proprietor of M/s. Decode Space Design and is in profession of architecture. The defendant approached the plaintiff for interior work with material in Showroom of M/s. Adsun Impex Pvt. Ltd. at shop no. 12/16, G Floor, Metro Mall, W.E.A., Karol Bagh, New Delhi. The plaintiff submitted the quotation of the work and the same was accepted by the defendant. The defendant paid a sum of Rs.2,50,000/- as advance to the plaintiff. As per the plaint, the defendant added more work in the already assigned work to the plaintiff. Th