MINTU @MILAN KUMAR vs THE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR

Judgment text excerpt

$~64 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 01.09.2025 + CRL.M.C. 6123/2025 & CRL.M.A. 26042/2025 MINTU @ MILAN KUMAR .....Petitioner Through: Mr. S.D. Kaushik, Advocate with petitioner in person. versus THE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. Nawal Kishore Jha, APP for the State with SI Mahesh Kumar Mr. Rana Sandeep, Advocate for R-2 with R-2 in person. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA J U D G M E N T (ORAL) 1. Petitioner seeks quashing of case FIR No. 171/2015 of PS Bhalswa Dairy for offence under Section 341/354D/506 IPC on the ground that the complainant de facto (respondent no.2) has compromised the disputes with the petitioner. 2. Respondent no. 2 present with her counsel and identified by IO/SI Mahesh Kumar accepts notice. Learned APP accepts notice and submits that he has no serious objection to this petition. 3. I have spoken with petitioner and respondent no. 2 in Hindi. CRL.M.C. 6123/2025 Page 1 of 2 pages GIRISH Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45569af3962c6fb4835d435f97626cacc a, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, KATHPALIA serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15570996b40f80cbd2eee60402c487965ff 801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2025.09.01 17:47:59 -07'00' Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed By:NEETU N NAIR Signing Date:01.09.2025 17:54:10 Respondent no. 2 submits that now for past almost 10 years after registration of FIR, the petitioner has not been troubling her at all. The petitioner explains that he used to travel with respondent no. 2 in the same auto, because their timings were same. Petitioner undertakes not to contact respondent no. 2 in any manner whatsoever. Respondent submits that she does not