M/S SUGBANDH PLATINUM PVT LTD vs M/S MAYA JEWELLERS

Judgment text excerpt

$~82 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of Decision: 23.09.2025 + CM(M) 1890/2025, CM APPL. 60495/2025 & CM APPL. 60496/2025 M/S SUGBANDH PLATINUM PVT LTD .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Kumar Shubham Kushwaha, Advocate. versus M/S MAYA JEWELLERS .....Respondent Through: Mr. Anil K. Bhasin, Advocate. CORAM: JUSTICE GIRISH KATHPALIA ORDER (ORAL) 1. The petitioner/plaintiff has assailed order dated 03.09.2025 of the learned trial court, whereby opportunity to cross examine DW1 was closed because despite last and final opportunity, counsel for the petitioner/plaintiff opted not to cross examine the witness. 2. Learned counsel for respondent/defendant appearing on advance intimation accepts notice and strongly opposes the petition, submitting that the petitioner/plaintiff is interested only in protracting the proceedings. CM(M) 1890/2025 Page 1 of 4 pages GIRISH Digitally signed by GIRISH KATHPALIA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF DELHI, Signature Not Verified 2.5.4.20=8401dd889b27a77b2f65ffffe4afec45569af3962c6fb 4835d435f97626cacca, ou=HIGH COURT OF DELHI,CID - KATHPALIA 7047638, postalCode=110003, st=Delhi, serialNumber=d3e86796451ec45c07b5d15570996b40f80cbd 2eee60402c487965ff801e26fa, cn=GIRISH KATHPALIA Date: 2025.09.23 18:10:55 -07'00' Digitally Signed By:NEETU N NAIR Signing Date:23.09.2025 18:14:10 3. At request of both sides, I have heard final arguments today itself. 4. For convenience, the impugned order is extracted below: “Adjournment sought on behalf of the plaintiff for cross-examination of DW1 on the ground that he has moved an application u/O.18 Rule 17 CPC for recalling PW Sh. Amit Verma. In the opinion of this Court, application for recalling of PW Amit Verma has no connection with the cross- examination of DW1. Accordingly, adjournment request is dec